adage used by those in the nursing profession. It’s known as The Five “Rights” of Patient Care
and is embraced by those responsible for ensuring that accurate and appropriate care is given to
patients. A mistake in their world could result in a life threatening situation. It is critical, therefore,
that mistakes are avoided. The Five “Rights” of Patient Care are:
- Right Patient: Make certain you treat the right person.
- Right Drug: Check that you provide the right medication to the right person.
- Right Dose: Dispense the right amount of the right medication to the right person.
- Right Route: Ensure the medication is given the right way (e.g., orally, topically, intravenously).
- Right Time: If the medication is going to make the person go to sleep, it is probably best to give it to them at bedtime.
The power of this adage is in its simplicity and made me think again about that fine book by Atul
Gawande, where he brings into focus the importance of checklists. The Five “Rights” is indeed a
checklist and one that, with only 5 points, is easy to commit to memory and easy to apply in
practice. When followed, it would be very difficult to screw something up.
So, I thought how one might take this simple patient care checklist and adapt it for the BPM
profession…The Five “Rights” of Business Process Management, since “screwing things up” is
alarmingly commonplace in the world of process improvement.
We approach new initiatives with all the best intentions but too often fail to execute, or execute
then fail to show any real, verifiable benefits (ROI) from our work. Too often, businesses fall
victim to poorly planned, poorly executed process improvement efforts. They are left with less
money and greater frustrations when yet another attempt to repair their troubled, inefficient
processes has been unsuccessful. What then? Recommending reorganization or maybe buying
some new technologies are options. Those usually take the heat off for a while. Or, we could
focus on the basics with five simple checks. Let’s see what the Five “Rights” of Business Process Management might look like.
Right ProcessObviously, we have to consider process; we’re process professionals after all. That means Right
number one would be “Right Process.” For any number of reasons, politics, squeaky wheel, easy
to work with users, the wrong process is often targeted to be fixed. We need to always ask the
question, “Is this process really the place we should be focusing our efforts?” Consider the
medical scenario a bit further. When a patient comes in to the emergency room complaining of
chest pains and a sore ankle, where does the medical staff focus their efforts? Most likely, they’ll
make certain the patient is not having a heart attack before tending to the ankle, even if the
patient may be complaining more loudly about the ankle.
It’s amazing how often process teams go to work on some back office process improvement
because they have support from departmental management or it’s just easier, while their critical
customer-facing processes are in cardiac arrest!
Another thing the emergency room staff does is to very quickly hook the patient up to monitors,
checking vital signs, and so on. They do this for the obvious reason that without current
information – metrics, they can’t possibly make an intelligent decision as to what course of
treatment is most appropriate.
Here again, we usually fail miserably in the “process” emergency room because we simply do not spend enough time or effort measuring and monitoring performance before we begin our
treatment. The result of this haste is often the death of the project, death of the process, or, in
extreme cases, death of the business.
Selection of the right process, especially in an organization where process thinking is not the
norm, is absolutely critical. It takes some intelligence and research to know what the “right” first
process is. Take time for some business triage before determining what processes are in need of treatment, which processes are likely to yield business value if treated, and which ones have the
greatest chance of recovery from the treatment. There’s little point in saving a process that really
should be left to die in the first place, or just left on life support. If a process does not add
tangible business value, don’t waste your time improving it.
Right SolutionThere are usually multiple ways to treat business issues. Too often, we take the easy route and
throw technology at the problem. If we again liken this to patient care, we have Right number
two, “Right Solution.” More and more, health care providers are pointing us toward natural
remedies; exercise and diet vs. medication, for example. If we consider how much business
value can be realized simply by modifying how we do what we do (i.e., true process
improvement), we may be able to either avoid investments in new technology or better leverage
the technology we already have.
When technology is necessary, we should be certain how it will be of benefit. If a healthcare
provider gave us a pill and said, “Not really sure what impact this is going to have on your
condition, but let’s give it a go,” it wouldn't instill much confidence. We want the provider to tell us
what we can expect.
Yet process and technology professionals will plead their cases for new technology not really
knowing how or if it will address the business problems it is purported to solve.
Applying technology to a business model with limited understanding of what can be expected is
simply unprofessional and should not be done. Granted, we can’t always know exactly how a
certain technology will perform in different environments, but we should be able to predict with a
high degree of confidence the business value we expect to realize. And if we are monitoring
performance as we should, we’ll know very early if we are realizing the desired results. Process
teams, uncertain of outcomes quite possibly are looking at the wrong solution, or are lacking the
skills and analysis needed before prescribing an expensive and perhaps unnecessary treatment.
Right ScopeScope creep is nothing new to those of us who have come from the IT world. Software
development projects routinely struggle with scope management. Scope creep is expensive, time
consuming, and increases the risk of project failure. Right number three is “Right Scope.”
IT projects usually creep up from added requirements and functionality, resulting in further
analysis and more lines of code to be written and tested. Business process projects can creep
for the same reasons, but requirements and functionality can be dramatically broader. Where an
IT project may need to add a field to a screen, or code some additional validation checks, a
process team may be directed to look at an additional line of business, or include a supply chain
with several business partners, or document process flows for branch operations at multiple
locations. These kinds of change requests can add months of effort to a project and cast the
team into a downward spiral of endless analysis and process modeling.
Prescribing the right dosage, right scope, for an improvement effort can mean the difference
between success and failure. Taking 2 antibiotic pills twice daily can kill an infection in 7 days.
Taking 4 antibiotics a day won’t kill the infection twice as fast. Teams that try to take on a
process that is too large will most likely become frustrated, lose management support, and fail to
deliver much, if any, value to the business.
Manage scope and don’t attempt a radical, cross-enterprise treatment unless it is absolutely
necessary. Smaller scope efforts can show value quickly and are more likely to be well received.
Process improvement will be recognized as a credible approach to treating business problems.
Right MessageProcess improvement is about change. People, in general, don’t like change. That’s just the way
it is. As process professionals, we need to adopt a bedside manner that will communicate
confidence and assurance and set people at ease with change. We need the “Right Message.”
How we position, market, and communicate the message of change will, in large measure,
determine how successful we are in effecting change. Do not take shortcuts or underestimate the effort necessary to develop a solid message.
Change and culture go hand in glove. Cultural impact must be assessed as part of process
improvement. Processes cannot mature independent of cultural change. Crafting the right
message means understanding the context in which that message will be received. Is the culture
one of rapid growth and frequent change? Has the organization been around for decades,
continuing to do things pretty much the way they have always done them? Does management
support and embrace change? Are people rewarded for creative thinking? Knowing the answers
to questions like these will help guide what messages need to be crafted and shared.
Don’t underestimate the need to market new ideas and concepts. Since change is hard and
makes people uncomfortable, we need to share information about new ideas more than just once
or twice via email. We need to allow people time to get comfortable with new ideas, to allay their
fears, and market the value of the change. Everyone needs to know “What’s in it for me?” We
may watch TV commercials over and again and still not be able name the product being sold.
Start marketing change well before implementation, crafting messages for both global audiences
and individual, one-on-one, water cooler conversations. Every change needs an “elevator pitch.”
If we want people to embrace change, we need to equip them with the appropriate information
and right message for them to do so.
Right TimeTiming can be a friend or foe when it comes to process change. Consider all the activities that
are taking place in your organization at any given point in time; year end closings, end-of-quarter
sales pushes for quotas, reorganizations, moves to new locations, launching new products, the
list goes on.
As with understanding culture, it is important to understand what activities or events are occurring
in an organization that may be captivating everyone’s attention. If I’m being asked to deliver a
significant month end report, or push to close a pending deal, now might not be the right time to
hit me up with process change, no matter how wonderful that change might be. I’m simply not in
a position or in the right frame of mind to deal with it.
We need to know our audience, know what is going on in their world, and be empathetic to their
situations. Great ideas introduced at the wrong time can quickly become really bad ideas. Our
good work could be all for naught. We may not get another chance to introduce it again because
the idea, the process change, is now tainted. More than once I’ve heard it said, “No, we tried that
once before and it didn’t work. We’re not going to do that again.” In reality, it wasn’t a bad idea
at all, it was just bad timing.
ConclusionNo matter how long we have worked in a given profession, we can always benefit from refocusing on the basics to improve our performance by following some simple checks. Am I targeting the
right process, with the right solution? Is my scope too big -- Will it take too long to succeed? Is
my message on target and informative? Is this really the right time, or should I wait until
conditions are more favorable?
- Right Process
- Right Solution
- Right Scope
- Right Message
- Right Time
Next week, Prolifics will be a Platinum sponsor at IBM Impact 2014, where our team will be showcasing our BPM solutions and recent successes. If you are planning to attend IBM Impact, be sure to visit Prolifics or schedule a one-on-one meeting with one of our experts.
To learn more about Prolifics' BPM solutions, visit www.prolifics.com or connect with Howard Webb:
Howard Webb is the BPM Advisory Services Director at Prolifics. Howard and his team provides consulting and guidance to clients in transitioning to highly efficient Process Managed business models, and equips them for success in their BPM initiatives. For over 25 years he has been a consultant, trainer, facilitator, and speaker on the topics of Business Process Management (BPM), data architecture, and project management. He founded the Midwest BPM Users Group and has published articles on BPM and enterprise architecture. Prior to coming to Prolifics, Howard was founder and partner of Bizappia, a consulting and services firm focused on business agility, performance and innovation. Prior to Bizappia, he was a Sr. BPM Technical Specialist with IBM.
**this article originally appeared on www.bptrends.com.